Anticoagulant Rodenticide Mitigation Informal Public Comment / Taller público informal del DPR sobre la mitigación - 9/24/25

380 Results

Sort:

Comment From: Michele Sutton-Riggs

11/03/25 @ 3:58 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Nancy Keating

11/03/25 @ 3:55 PM
California does not need to rely on cruel, outdated poisons. Integrated Pest Management strategies — sealing buildings, removing food and water sources, and employing non-toxic controls such as contraceptives, snap traps, and electric traps — are hum...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Roy Brenner

11/03/25 @ 3:54 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dr. April Modesti

11/03/25 @ 3:53 PM
I oppose the use of anticoagulant rodenticide as its' usage may affect pets and have other unintended consequences.
No attachments

Comment From: Kellen Dunn

11/03/25 @ 3:53 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Karen Bolte

11/03/25 @ 3:43 PM
Your dog or cat may be the unintended swallower of this rodenticide by swallowing creatures who ingested it. All the wildlife your children see and watch may suffer agonizing death at your hand. Putting this out into the environment to kill rodents i...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ann Graves

11/03/25 @ 3:42 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Maria Nesheim

11/03/25 @ 3:41 PM
Yes. It's important that DPR. Anticoagulant Rodenticide Mitigation of Pesticides be investigated and the problem of anticoagulant Rodenticides be solved !
No attachments

Comment From: Deborah Goodrich

11/03/25 @ 3:41 PM
I am writing as a California resident in strong opposition to any proposed changes that would create exemptions for, or expand the use of, anticoagulant rodenticides (ARs), and in support of a total ban on these dangerous poisons.

Undermining Wildli...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Krupa Shah

11/03/25 @ 3:41 PM
Anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned. We shouldn't be expanding exemptions for their use. Even with today's limitations, these poisons continue to harm non-target wildlife like mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and endangered San Joaquin kit foxe...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Julia Thomas

11/03/25 @ 3:40 PM
Please do not use poisons that have been shown to be harmful to the environment!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Maria Ballardo

11/03/25 @ 3:39 PM
I know rats,mice are a problem but knowing that they eat poison they travel and die. Other predators don't know the rat has eaten poison and the animal is hungry and eats the animal with poison and later dies becuase it ate poison. We understand the ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marilyn Borges

11/03/25 @ 3:35 PM
I support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and am in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legislation in 2020, 2023, an...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Roger Lilly

11/03/25 @ 3:33 PM
As a California resident, I support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legisl...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Carolyn Lilly

11/03/25 @ 3:31 PM
Please save our precious wild animals!!
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Walden

11/03/25 @ 3:29 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Ilya Turov

11/03/25 @ 3:28 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Edith Sando

11/03/25 @ 3:26 PM
Please protect all animals. Poisoning is a terrible and painful death. Please be kind to all animals and birds.
No attachments

Comment From: Raqel Cito

11/03/25 @ 3:24 PM
Please choose conservation over greed and compassion over cruelty.
No attachments

Comment From: Suparna Vashisht

11/03/25 @ 3:23 PM
I am a California resident and I am writing to express my support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides. I am strongly opposed to any exemptions for the use of rodenticides.

California does not need to rely on cruel, outdated poisons. Integr...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Benjamin Billhardt

11/03/25 @ 3:19 PM
Hello,

My name is Benjamin and I support a total ban on the use of anticoagulant rodenticide. I also oppose any rollback of current restrictions on the use of these pesticides.
These chemicals are so destructive to California's biodiversity and e...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Lacey Levitt

11/03/25 @ 3:18 PM
As a California resident, I support a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides. I oppose any changes to regulations that would give exemptions on the use of rodenticides; protections gained through legislation in 2020 through 2024 must be retained. Ro...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Peter Yaholkovsky

11/03/25 @ 3:18 PM
Let's only intervene very carefully and specifically in the ecosystem.
No attachments

Comment From: Anonymous Anonymous

11/03/25 @ 3:17 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Emily Talkington

11/03/25 @ 3:16 PM
As a domestic and wildlife veterinarian in California, I strongly oppose Any use of rodenticides or changes that would allow for Any use or production in California. It is inhumane and dangerous for animals, humans, and the environment.
Thank you, ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Sid Shapiro

11/03/25 @ 3:15 PM
i am a California resident and I vehemently object to any change in the rules and regulations governing the use of anticoagulant rodenticides that would allow more use. We need an absolute, total ban on these awful pesticides, not rules that would a...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dyan Osborne

11/03/25 @ 3:15 PM
I am a California resident in support of the previous laws governing the use of pesticides. Please do not loosen these restrictions.
No attachments

Comment From: Nina Wouk

11/03/25 @ 3:14 PM
Anti-coagulant rodenticides always kill animals other than their intended targets and should never be used, not by households, not by businesses, not by government agencies, not by anybody. There are less gruesome and more selective ways to kill mic...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Val Barri

11/03/25 @ 3:12 PM
STOP THE PESTICIDES!!!!!!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Wasserman

11/03/25 @ 3:11 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Botones

11/03/25 @ 3:11 PM
COWARDLY, CRUEL, SADISTIC AND HEARTLESS!!! STOP SUPPORTING CRUELTY!!!

I am a California resident in SUPPORT OF A TOTAL BAN on anticoagulant rodenticides and in STRONG OPPOSITION to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the u...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Maureen McCauley

11/03/25 @ 3:11 PM
CA doesn't need to use outdated pest control that results inthedeath of other animals, some endangered.

All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: FLYNN M COLEMAN

11/03/25 @ 3:08 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Gloria Aguirre

11/03/25 @ 3:07 PM
California does not need to rely on cruel, outdated poisons. Integrated Pest Management strategies — sealing buildings, removing food and water sources, and employing non-toxic controls such as contraceptives, snap traps, and electric traps — are hum...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michelle Madole

11/03/25 @ 3:07 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Abigail Rizzo

11/03/25 @ 3:06 PM
I am a California resident, and I support a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state leg...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Brandi Phillips

11/03/25 @ 3:05 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: David Coleman

11/03/25 @ 3:04 PM
Please ban the anticoagulant rodenticides. They also kill all types of animals and birds that prey on them.
No attachments

Comment From: Allison Cohen

11/03/25 @ 3:03 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Pemberton

11/03/25 @ 3:02 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Michelle Setaro

11/03/25 @ 3:01 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Alicia Newman

11/03/25 @ 3:01 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kenneth Althiser

11/03/25 @ 3:01 PM
I am a California resident who supports a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and strongly oppose any changes to the regulations that grant exemptions for the use of rodenticides or would roll back protections gained by state legislation in 2020,...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Janet Heinle

11/03/25 @ 3:00 PM
I am stating that I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections ga...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Laura CG

11/03/25 @ 3:00 PM
Help innocent animals!
No attachments

Comment From: Adrienne Metter

11/03/25 @ 2:59 PM


All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls,...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Candi Ausman

11/03/25 @ 2:57 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Niel Shaw

11/03/25 @ 2:56 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: MARY ROJESKI

11/03/25 @ 2:56 PM
THESE POISONS HARM EVERY CREATURE UP AND DOWN THE FOOD CHAIN!!! STOP USING THIS CRAP!!! HOW MANY YEARS WILL IT TAKE TO END THIS??
No attachments

Comment From: Randle Sink

11/03/25 @ 2:54 PM
Just ban anticoagulants rodenticides once and for all. Use natural methods.
No attachments

Comment From: Fabricio Evandro Moser

11/03/25 @ 2:53 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Dianne Buckley

11/03/25 @ 2:53 PM
STOP TREATING THE WORLDS ANIMALS AS NON BREATHING, HEART PUMPING USELESS, SOULESS NON ENTITIES !!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Sam Ferrero

11/03/25 @ 2:53 PM
California does not need to rely on cruel, outdated poisons. Integrated Pest Management strategies — sealing buildings, removing food and water sources, and employing non-toxic controls such as contraceptives, snap traps, and electric traps — are hum...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Mark Weinberger

11/03/25 @ 2:52 PM
All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions, bobcats, owls, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Barbara Cunningham

11/03/25 @ 2:51 PM
Talking points:

All anticoagulant rodenticides should be banned and should not have exemptions for them expanded. Even with existing restrictions, anticoagulant rodenticides continue to kill and harm non-target animals — including mountain lions...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Laura Herndon

11/03/25 @ 2:50 PM
I am a California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes to the regulations that would give exemptions for the use of rodenticides that would roll back protections gained by state legi...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Keith Grenier

11/03/25 @ 1:35 PM
We shouldn't allow anticoagulant rodenticides in California. We already allow the use of it for emergency public health needs, so it isn't necessary to allow them for other scenarios. This will impact wildlife in a negative way for decades to come....↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jasmine Reyda

11/03/25 @ 11:40 AM
Please do not allow anticoagulant rodenticides to be used in California for non-emergency/nonpublic health reasons. These rodenticides damage and can potentially destroy ecosystems by killing hawks, owls, kestrels and other birds of prey. These bir...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Allan Smith

11/03/25 @ 11:07 AM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),

No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and

California must invest in ecological rodent control to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Haley Peterson

11/03/25 @ 9:38 AM
On the California Coastside there is already evidence of people illegally using rodenticides which has resulted in numerous barn owl deaths this year. Instead of allowing these poisons into our environment we should be putting programs in place that ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: William Collins

11/03/25 @ 6:26 AM
Rodenticides and pesticides must be strictly regulated, or prohibited due to their secondary effects on nontarget species.

Birds of prey are killed by the thousands when they eat poisoned rodents.
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Rudin

11/02/25 @ 10:04 PM
Anticoagulants are toxic and non-selective, killing the very wildlife that naturally controls rodents.

DPR is legally obligated to protect wildlife, not poison it.

Allowing >100 days of poison use ensures continued contamination of predators, pets...↓
No attachments

Comment From: April Ramos

11/02/25 @ 8:55 PM
I strongly support legislation to eliminate anticoagulant rodenticides, which are toxic and non-selective, often killing the very wildlife that naturally controls rodents. I support investment in safer, science-based alternatives. Please take acti...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Herring

11/02/25 @ 8:46 PM
Please continue current law that No anticoagulant rodenticide be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency. No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable. California must invest in ecological rodent con...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Wayne Montoya

11/01/25 @ 5:57 PM
I respectfully give my full & strong opposition to the proposed changes to the Anticoagulant Rodentcides (SGARs & FGARS) existing use rules (AB 1788, AB 2552 & AB 1322) which restricts their use exept under the existing & very limited set of exemptio...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Bernhard

11/01/25 @ 3:36 PM
Please do NOT allow anticoagulant rodenticides, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law). Please do NOT allow rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322.

California needs ecological rodent control such as raptors...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Matt Rossell

10/31/25 @ 11:50 AM
Dear Department of Pesticide Regulation,

I am a compassionate California resident in support of a total ban on anticoagulant rodenticides and in strong opposition to any changes or exemptions to the regulations that would undermine the laws put in ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Elizabeth Chapman

10/30/25 @ 7:23 PM
Please please keep strong limits on rodenticides. Owls, hawks, and other predators are already losing out to human impact. My own dog has been terribly sickened recently from digging up a poisoned gopher. There are tedious but effective alternatives ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Jill Kaplan

10/30/25 @ 10:26 AM
Anticoagulants are toxic and non-selective, killing the very wildlife that naturally controls rodents-- and threatens to harm our pets and children. No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joyce Reeder

10/29/25 @ 9:50 AM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),
No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and California must invest in ecological rodent control
to pr...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Marlene Zobayan

10/28/25 @ 6:04 PM
These substances poison the wildlife around them, some of these wildlife is endangered. There is no need for poisons, other solutions are available,
No attachments

Comment From: Michele Tennies

10/28/25 @ 12:20 PM
I glad that I found this in hope that it might make a difference and help make matters better.

We live in the Villages, Evergreen area of San Jose, the do use poison in their rat traps, the one they put in out carport when we lived on Montgomery Ben...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Judy Rickard

10/28/25 @ 11:01 AM
stop allowing these pesticides to kill birds who eat poisoned rodents.
No attachments

Comment From: Larry McNary

10/28/25 @ 8:36 AM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),
No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and
California must invest in ecological rodent control to pr...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Paul Taylor

10/27/25 @ 5:56 PM
I am opposed to using any toxic chemicals to control the rodent population. The roll back of current regulations should be stopped in order to prevent the unwanted death of birds and other wildlife that would ingest the rat poison.
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Kaufman

10/27/25 @ 4:16 PM
Please do not do anything to weaken the new laws re anticoagulant rodenticides. Until there is a greater natural balance between rodents and raptors and covids (like coyotes), there is the risk of an increase in rodents. I live in a single family ho...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rae Lee

10/26/25 @ 9:32 PM
The proposal to allow more than 100 days each year of poison use will devastate the environment. Anticoagulants are toxic and non-selective, killing the very wildlife like raptors and carnivore mammals that naturally controls rodents. As such, this p...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kris Hauck

10/26/25 @ 7:12 PM
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Please remove these from the marketplace. They impact more species than is intended and poisoning our environment.
No attachments

Comment From: Linda Adler

10/26/25 @ 6:26 PM
Stop the Rollback on Rodenticide Protections!!!
No attachments

Comment From: Jeanne Wu

10/26/25 @ 9:53 AM
DO NOT allow the rollback of important legislation designed to protect animals, birds and the creatures with whom we share the planet. Do not allow rat poisons. What are you trying to gain?

Jeanne Wu
Atherton, Ca.
No attachments

Comment From: Constance Habash

10/25/25 @ 4:15 PM
To the California Department of Pesticide Regulation -
I am increasingly concerned about the impacts of rodent pesticides - including, but not limited to anticoagulant pesticides - on our local wildlife and pets. I have found dead animals that I susp...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Reyhaneh Eghbali

10/25/25 @ 3:56 PM

Hello - I live in a wooded area with much wildlife. Are there rats? For sure - they have been in my attic, my crawlspace and they eat my fruits, but I manage them without anticoagulant rodenticides. Why? Because it is not humane. I firmly believ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Katharine Finlay

10/25/25 @ 3:50 PM
As a biology teacher, I know that if predators are killed off, prey will multiply. Anticoagulant rodenticides kill the very predators (raptors, foxes, etc) that control rat populations naturally. Do not weaken the restrictions that have been carefull...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Naomi Goodman

10/24/25 @ 6:26 PM
Rollback of the protections against ecological damage and risk to humans and pets from use of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) is unacceptable. These persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals are known to pose significant risks to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Carol Selter

10/24/25 @ 2:10 PM
I am shocked that DPR is considering allowing anticoagulant rodenticides to be used for over 3 months/year. Those poisons have far-reaching effects up the food chain and are well-known to be reducing populations of owls, bobcats, mountain lions, and ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Melissa Hero

10/24/25 @ 8:17 AM
Raptors are the solution. When Anticoagulant Rodenticide is used, everything in the food web suffers/dies, not just the rodents. This then reduces the natural predators such as foxes, coyotes, bobcats, owls and hawks, which do an amazing job of con...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Joan and Charles Coston

10/23/25 @ 1:35 PM
Rather than spend time and money on poisoning the environment, let's improve conditions for rodent predators by not killing them in droves with these rodenticides. This is a major step backward in rodent control, and should be cancelled.
No attachments

Comment From: Glyn Williams

10/23/25 @ 11:07 AM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),
No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and
California must invest in ecological rodent control to pr...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kira Od

10/23/25 @ 10:05 AM
Do NOT roll back regulation on bioaccumulative, anticoagulant rodenticides. AB 1788, 2552, and 1322 were passed with the will of the California public to restrict the use of these chemicals that are deadly to predators, pets, and raptors, and use eco...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Margaret Roth

10/22/25 @ 10:52 PM
It is unacceptable and antithetical to me and
most Californians to roll back AB 1788,
AB 2552 or AB 1322. We've worked hard to ensure that no anticoagulant should ever be used unless there is a critical environmental emergency necessitating their u...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Rick Sakuda

10/22/25 @ 5:37 PM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),

No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and

California must invest in ecological rodent control to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Suchi Jain

10/22/25 @ 3:17 PM
It is imperative that we continue to impose restrictions on the use of chemical agents intended to eliminate species that humans deem pests, and instead promote the adoption of environmentally sustainable alternatives. Achieving this objective requir...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Molly Graves

10/22/25 @ 2:28 PM
I am not in favor of mitigating restrictions on anticoagulants poisons in the Poison Free Wildlife Act. These poisons not only poison all an animals (raptors , owls, etc) that prey on rodents but also add to the poison load in our over all environmen...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Claire Seda

10/22/25 @ 2:14 PM
Anticoagulants are toxic and non-selective. The wildlife that naturally controls rodents -- including owls and other raptors, coyotes and foxes, and more -- get killed by anticoagulants, causing MORE rodents to infest our California communities, not ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Susan Dentinger

10/22/25 @ 1:59 PM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),

No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and

California must invest in ecological rodent control to ...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Leah Shimabuku

10/22/25 @ 12:15 PM
No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law),no rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is acceptable, and California must invest in ecological rodent control to pro...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kathy Switky

10/22/25 @ 10:56 AM
I am disappointed in the proposed rollback of regulations on anticoagulant rodenticides. I have seen firsthand the effects of these toxic, non-selective poisons on wildlife. DPR is legally obligated to PROTECT wildlife and should maintain the current...↓
No attachments

Comment From: Kimberly Hansen

10/22/25 @ 9:57 AM
Please do not weaken restrictions on the use of anticoagulant rodenticides. I'm concerned about their effects on humans and all other animals. Thank you, Kim
No attachments

Comment From: Mary Spangler

10/22/25 @ 9:48 AM
These should be banned unless used exclusively inside by licensed pest operaters. We see dead birds, we have had a dog get sick from ingesting an infected rodent.
No attachments

Comment From: Marion Farber

10/22/25 @ 9:29 AM
I urge you NOT to roll back the rules on anticoagulant rodenticides.

No anticoagulant rodenticides should be allowed, except during a declared public health or environmental emergency (current law). No rollback of AB 1788, AB 2552, or AB 1322 is ac...↓
No attachments

[ Previous Page / Next Page ]