On behalf of V. A. Rodden, Inc. we write to express our opposition to the proposed Pesticide Notification System. CDPR and the County Ag Commissioners already have the most stringent pesticide control system in place, and this proposal will not provi...↓
• We oppose the proposed pesticide notification system
• We oppose providing acreage information that could be used to identify the exact parcel where the pesticide is being applied
• CDPR needs to explain the pesticide registration process and how application rates, buffer zones, and allowed uses are determined to prevent exposure to workers, residents, and innocent bystanders.
• If CDPR moves forward, notification should be limited to only those who are immediately adjacent to the proposed application and not open to just anyone who so desires.
William R. Jackson
President
On behalf of Crow Road Farming, LLC we write to express our opposition to the proposed Pesticide Notification System. CDPR and the County Ag Commissioners already have the most stringent pesticide control system in place, and this proposal will not provide any more protections. In fact, we are concerned that CDPR will provide farm specific information which will allow anti-pesticide activists to oppose our applications. CDPR should not give in to activists and should instead actively defend the already protective system currently in place. What will CDPR do in case an application is appealed and
delayed unnecessarily?
• We oppose the proposed pesticide notification system
• We oppose providing acreage information that could be used to identify the exact parcel where the pesticide is being applied
• CDPR needs to explain the pesticide registration process and how application rates, buffer zones, and allowed uses are determined to prevent exposure to workers, residents, and innocent bystanders.
• If CDPR moves forward, notification should be limited to only those who are immediately adjacent to the proposed application and not open to just anyone
who so desires.
William R. Jackson
Managing Member
On behalf of Hill Creek Farms, LLC we write to express our opposition to the proposed Pesticide Notification System. CDPR and the County Ag Commissioners already have the most stringent pesticide control system in place, and this proposal will not provide any more protections. In fact, we are concerned that CDPR will provide farm specific information which will allow anti-pesticide activists to oppose our applications. CDPR should not give in to activists and should instead actively defend the already protective system currently in place. What will CDPR do in case an application is appealed and delayed unnecessarily?
• We oppose the proposed pesticide notification system
• We oppose providing acreage information that could be used to identify the exact parcel where the pesticide is being applied
• CDPR needs to explain the pesticide registration process and how application rates, buffer zones, and allowed uses are determined to prevent exposure to workers, residents, and innocent bystanders.
• If CDPR moves forward, notification should be limited to only those who are immediately adjacent to the proposed application and not open to just anyone
who so desires.
William R. Jackson
Managing Member
On behalf of Triple L Investments, LLC we write to express our opposition to the proposed Pesticide Notification System. CDPR and the County Ag Commissioners already have the most stringent pesticide control system in place, and this proposal will not provide any more protections. In fact, we are concerned that CDPR will provide farm specific information which will allow anti-pesticide activists to oppose our applications. CDPR should not give in to activists and should instead actively defend the already protective system currently in place. What will CDPR do in case an application is appealed and delayed unnecessarily?
• We oppose the proposed pesticide notification system
• We oppose providing acreage information that could be used to identify the exact parcel where the pesticide is being applied
• CDPR needs to explain the pesticide registration process and how application rates, buffer zones, and allowed uses are determined to prevent exposure to workers, residents, and innocent bystanders.
• If CDPR moves forward, notification should be limited to only those who are immediately adjacent to the proposed application and not open to just
anyone who so desires.
William R. Jackson
Managing Member
On behalf of Quinto Land Company, LLC we write to express our opposition to the proposed Pesticide Notification System. CDPR and the County Ag Commissioners already have the most stringent pesticide control system in place, and this proposal will not provide any more protections. In fact, we are concerned that CDPR will provide farm specific information which will allow anti-pesticide activists to oppose our applications. CDPR should not give in to
activists and should instead actively defend the already protective system currently in place. What will CDPR do in case an application is appealed and delayed unnecessarily?
• We oppose the proposed pesticide notification system
• We oppose providing acreage information that could be used to identify the exact parcel where the pesticide is being applied
• CDPR needs to explain the pesticide registration process and how application rates, buffer zones, and allowed uses are determined to prevent exposure to workers, residents, and innocent bystanders.
• If CDPR moves forward, notification should be limited to only those who are immediately adjacent to the proposed application and not open to just anyone who so desires.
William R. Jackson
Managing Member
↓